top of page
Handshake

News & Commentary for the Digital UK

Welcome

An EU flag under the Arc de Triomphe has sparked a furious battle over national identity.


The eyes of the world will be on France in 2022. On 1 January France assumed the rotating presidency of the European Union, and in April it will hold its presidential elections.



The eyes of the world will be on France in 2022. On 1 January France assumed the rotating presidency of the European Union, and in April it will hold its presidential elections. Incumbent Emmanuel Macron hopes to use the EU presidency as a springboard for his French presidential campaign – to project an image of himself as Europe’s de facto leader, now that Germany’s Angela Merkel has exited the international stage. But the way the French government chose to celebrate the EU presidency has already kicked the hornet’s nest of the culture wars. National landmarks in Paris, like the Élysée Palace, Notre Dame and the Eiffel Tower, were lit up in EU blue. And most significantly, the Arc de Triomphe was adorned with a giant EU flag, right above where the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier is housed. In other words, some of the most recognisable, even sacred, symbols of the French nation and its history were being reimagined and subverted as symbols of the EU.


This unforced error has drawn condemnation from Macron’s opponents across the political spectrum, and has given us some insight into the upcoming elections.

As you might expect, Macron’s challengers on the Eurosceptic and extreme right – Éric Zemmour and Marine Le Pen – were most forceful in their condemnations. Le Pen called the flag stunt an ‘offensive provocation to those who fought for France’. Zemmour declared it an ‘insult’ and a form of vandalism.


Valérie Pécresse, presidential candidate from the centre-right Républicains and current leader of the greater Paris region, spotted an opportunity for triangulation. She denounced Macron’s ‘erasure of French identity’, while calling for the French flag to be restored next to the EU flag. In doing so she was setting out her stall as a candidate who is broadly pro-EU but opposed to giving up any more national sovereignty. Even figures on the left have accused Macron of rewriting history for propaganda purposes, to promote his vision of EU federalism. ‘The unknown soldier did not die for Brussels’, said one MP from the far-left France Insoumise party.


The controversy forced the government’s hand. The EU flag was removed earlier than planned from the Arc de Triomphe, just 48 hours after it was raised. The outrage generated by flag-gate was a stark reminder that most French citizens do not share Macron’s Europhilia. France is among the most Eurosceptic countries in the EU. (Indeed, even Macron admitted back in 2018 that the French public would ‘probably’ vote for Frexit in a referendum.)


More significantly, the flag incident suggests that the elections to come will likely be defined by the culture wars. Questions of the nation state, the EU, globalism, immigration, the place of Islam in secular French society and the challenge of Islamist extremism are likely to be at the forefront. Certainly, voters are becoming more restless on these issues. Polls point to a deep unease with the direction of modern France, with majorities saying they no longer feel ‘at home’ in France, that immigration is too high and that France is a nation in decline.

What the elections will not be is a clash between traditional parties of the left and right. Indeed, the crumbling of the established left and right parties is what brought Macron to power in the first place back in 2017.


Macron ran at a time when the incumbent president, François Hollande of the Parti Socialiste, was so unpopular that he did not even dare contest the election. Meanwhile, the centre-right Républicains were mired in corruption scandals. Amid this wreckage, Macron was able to win without the backing of a major political party. (En Marche, as his upstart party was called at the time, even shares Macron’s initials, in case it were not already obvious that it is shaped entirely around him as the figurehead.) Extraordinarily, despite a turbulent term in office, Macron is still the favourite to win in 2022. Les Républicains have recovered a great deal of ground since then. The party performed well in the 2021 regional elections and polling suggests that Pécresse poses a serious challenge to Macron. But the left is almost nowhere to be seen. Anne Hidalgo, mayor of Paris and candidate for the Parti Socialiste, is languishing in the polls on a shockingly low three per cent, behind even the far-left firebrand, Jean-Luc Mélenchon of France Insoumise, on 10 per cent. Instead, almost all of the initiative and insurgency is coming from the right – from Zemmour and Le Pen on the extreme right, and Pécresse on the centre-right. Even Macron, who was elected as a socially liberal candidate, has moved rightwards during his term in anticipation of this year’s vote. He has introduced tough new laws against what he calls ‘Islamist separatism’. And last year his interior minister, Gérald Darmamin, accused Marine Le Pen in a live television debate of being ‘too soft’ on Islam. The presidential campaign is extremely volatile, and it is not yet clear which candidate of the right will benefit most from this broader shift, or if any of them can muster the support to get them to the Élysée Palace. Zemmour, Le Pen and Pécresse have all at various points been contenders for the second round of voting, which would pitch them head-to-head against Macron. Macron would no doubt prefer to be up against one of the extreme candidates. A replay of the 2017 elections could serve him well, as Zemmour and Le Pen may well be too unpalatable to a majority of voters. Zemmour, a TV journalist and bestselling author, is easily the most infamous and talked about challenger. He draws huge crowds to his rallies. To his critics, he is a racist or even a white supremacist – he has twice been convicted of inciting racial hatred and is currently on trial for another hate-speech charge. At his most extreme, he has propagated the so-called Great Replacement conspiracy theory and has downplayed the crimes of France’s Vichy regime during the Holocaust. To Zemmour’s fans, he speaks most clearly to the pervasive sense of national decline. The title of his most recent book, La France n’a pas dit son dernier mot, roughly translates as ‘France has not said its last word’. In other words, Zemmour’s pitch is to ‘make France great again’. Like Macron in 2017, Zemmour has had to establish his own ‘party’ (Reconquête) to fight the elections, such is the fluidity of French politics in the current era.

Zemmour and Le Pen may share many concerns about immigration, Islam and Europe, but they are fundamentally different beasts. While Le Pen’s strategy has been to target the disaffected working class, many of whom once voted for communist parties, Zemmour draws support from a more well-to-do and well-educated constituency. He presents himself as an intellectual rather than a populist. It is not yet clear whether Zemmour and Le Pen will split the far-right vote, with one blocking the other from reaching the second round, or whether they will complement each other’s campaigns. Whoever comes out on top, it is clear that France has entered a new era of politics. Voters and parties are fragmented along new lines, around questions of culture, identity and nationhood. And while no new force can yet command a serious majority in society, it’s clear that the old order, that simple contest between centre-left and centre-right, is well and truly dead.


Source: Spiked

Prominent anti-lockdown figure Piers Corbyn helped lead ‘freedom rally’ through Milton Keynes

Police are appealing for information on the dozens of people filmed taking over an NHS test-and-trace site in Milton Keynes, with one woman captured ransacking an office and stealing what appears to be various Covid testing samples and equipment. A large group of anti-vaxxers were filmed on Wednesday storming the facility – where PCR tests are sent to be analysed – holding placards reading “Freedom is not negotiable” and chanting slogans such as “You can shove your f***ing vaccine up your a***”.

Police are appealing for information on the dozens of people filmed taking over an NHS test-and-trace site in Milton Keynes, with one woman captured ransacking an office and stealing what appears to be various Covid testing samples and equipment. A large group of anti-vaxxers were filmed on Wednesday storming the facility – where PCR tests are sent to be analysed – holding placards reading “Freedom is not negotiable” and chanting slogans such as “You can shove your f***ing vaccine up your a***”. The footage, which was shared on social media, also showed members of the crowd throwing traffic cones towards the marquee set up to administer tests, while a man can be heard announcing via a loud hailer that they “come peacefully”.

It was not immediately clear if those present believed the testing site was a vaccination centre but much of the anger expressed in the videos appeared to be about Covid jabs.



Some of the crowd were videoed approaching centre staff, shouting at them to “take off” their fluorescent orange NHS jackets, demanding to know if they “have been vaccinated” and filming them on their mobile the far-right For Britain Movement, addressed the crowd before leading its charge through the site, where he claimed there were “millions” of like-minded anti-vaccine activists who have “woken up”. Others are shown knocking down signs for the testing centre, while the crowd is heard shouting “shame on you” and “fascist bastards”. MPs condemned the actions of those at the protest, with shadow trade secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds criticising people for their “dreadful” behaviour and for abusing “NHS staff [who] are working over the festive season to help others”.


He urged anyone with information to pass this onto Thames Valley Police, while Tory MP Alicia Kearns thanked all the NHS “volunteers and staff who deserve so much better than this shameful, self-aggrandising nonsense”.


Source: Independent

Thousands of women accused of witchcraft in Scotland are set to be posthumously pardoned after almost 300 years.


Their crimes range from causing hangovers and turning into an owl to meeting with the Devil and conjuring up storms to sink the ships of King James VI.


Now, as a result of a petition, those accused of being witches under the Witchcraft Act between 1563 and 1736 are to have their names cleared.

Of the approximate 4,000 people accused, over half were executed. And more than 85 per cent of those convicted were women or girls.

A members' bill in the Scottish parliament has gained the support of Nicola Sturgeon's administration after a two-year campaign, the Sunday Times reported.


The petition had been instigated by Claire Mitchell QC, who leads Witches of Scotland, a group campaigning for a pardon, a government apology and an official monument for the victims.

The fear of 'witches' centuries ago was fuelled by religion. The Catholic Church had decreed that heretics and witches should be burned at the stake.


The Great Scottish Witch Hunt

Witchcraft laws passed by James IV of Scotland led to a nationwide search for witches that became known as the Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1597.

It was in fact the second of five national witch hunts in Scottish history.

Like the others it was conducted under the supervision of Royal Commissions.

But it is one of the most poorly documented of the Great Scottish Witch hunts as it was not documented centrally.

Instead, local authorities were left to record the accusations and outcomes of trials.

Around 200 'witches' are believed to have been killed in the 1597 witch hunt.

The other Great Scottish Witch Hunts took place in 1590-91, 1628-1631, 1649-59 and 1661-62.


Ms Mitchell was partly inspired by the case of Lilias Adie.

After confessing, under duress, to the crimes of casting malicious spells and having sex with the Devil, Ms Adie, from Torryburn, Fife, Adie died in 1704.


She had been sentenced to be burnt to death but died in prison, possibly by suicide.

Her body was buried on the village's foreshore under a large stone.

In recognition, Torryburn villagers and members of the 'Fife Witches Remembered' Facebook gathered at her grave on September 1, 2019, and laid wreaths.

The event also commemorated the thousands of Scottish men and women prosecuted and killed for allegedly practising witchcraft in the 16 to 18th centuries.

Speaking to MailOnline earlier this month, Cali White, a psychotherapist from West Sussex, cited the case of Geillis Duncan, a Scottish maidservant.

'At a time before GP surgeries and the NHS, people were responsible for their own health decisions and might have consulted a local "Cunning Woman" who used herbs and intention, or "magic" to create healing potions.

'These were often the women targeted as "witches", like Geillis Duncan, a maidservant in Scotland, accused of witchcraft by her magistrate employer in 1590.


'Known to have had a reputation as a healer, Geillis’s brutal torture sparked the North Berwick witch hunts in which 70 people were tried for witchcraft.

'Healing and plant knowledge became a dangerous occupation.'



Natalie Don, a Scottish National Party MSP behind the bill, which could be passed as early as next summer, told the Sunday Times: 'It is right that this wrong should be righted, that these people who were criminalised, mostly women, should be pardoned.'


Source: Daily Mail

Blog
bottom of page